Heads up! To view this whole video, sign in with your Courses account or enroll in your free 7-day trial. Sign In Enroll
Well done!
You have completed Soft Skills!
You have completed Soft Skills!
Preview
There are a number of grammatical errors that people make all the time. If you're aware of these problems, you can anticipate them, find them, and solve them before you ever hit send or publish.
This video doesn't have any notes.
Related Discussions
Have questions about this video? Start a discussion with the community and Treehouse staff.
Sign upRelated Discussions
Have questions about this video? Start a discussion with the community and Treehouse staff.
Sign up
You know, no matter how much the English
language continues
0:00
to evolve we have to maintain a grasp on
basic grammar.
0:02
So right now I wanna share a number
0:07
of common grammatical mistakes that lots
of people make.
0:09
Sometimes on a daily basis, and
0:12
more importantly they happen in
professional communications,
0:14
marketing text, signs on the front of
0:18
stores, even job applications and cover
letters.
0:20
So, if you're aware of these problems, you
can anticipate them, you can find them.
0:24
And you can solve them before you ever hit
Send or Publish on anything you write.
0:29
So, let's begin.
0:34
First, apostrophes.
0:35
Apostrophes, they have multiple functions.
0:38
Now, first, it can show possession, like
Nick's iPhone, for example.
0:41
Nick apostrophe s.
0:45
That belongs to Nick, all right?
0:47
Secondly, it can also show that a word is
a contraction or a
0:49
combination of two words, like is not
0:52
becomes isn't or should have becomes
should've.
0:55
But what apostrophes should not be used
for, is to make something plural.
0:58
For example, in this example, I took some
picture's of my new car.
1:03
Well we're talking about multiple pictures
here, so the correct
1:08
way to pluralize the word is just to add
an s.
1:10
In no way does this refer to any type
1:13
of possession, or like something belonging
to the pictures.
1:16
This is just a simple plural word so just
add s.
1:19
The correct way to pluralize it is, I took
some pictures of my new car.
1:23
Picture with an s on the end.
1:27
Now the only exception for using an
apostrophe
1:30
for making something plural is when you're
referring to
1:33
say, a single character, like replace all
the
1:37
lower case p's in the code with uppercase
P's.
1:40
So you could do like a P apostrophe s,
just so it
1:44
doesn't look like PS and it looks like
[SOUND] what does that mean?
1:47
I don't know, P apostrophe S, that's fine.
1:52
But, you know, if the apostrophes weren't
there, it would look a
1:55
little weird, so that's the only exception
really I can think of.
1:57
Contractions.
2:01
On the related subject of contractions,
most people don't have problems
2:02
using them, but there's sometimes
2:06
confusion about what the contractions
mean.
2:08
For example, when someone says, oh, you
should of seen the fireworks tonight.
2:11
They are saying, you should have seen the
fireworks tonight.
2:15
They're not saying you should of.
2:19
I know it sounds like that.
2:21
Should've, would've, could've, all the
others like that.
2:23
It sound perhaps like people are saying
the
2:26
word of, but it is a contraction, all
right.
2:29
So keep in mind that where the apostrophe
is in a contraction.
2:31
That's where, generally, the missing
letters are when you combine two words.
2:37
You know, so when you combine isn't or I'm
sorry, when you
2:42
combine is not, the apostrophe takes the
place of that missing O.
2:45
It becomes isn't.
2:49
So when we say should've, we're actually
eliminating the
2:51
H and the A from have and we're making
should've.
2:54
So that's how contractions work.
2:59
Quotation marks, this is something I see a
lot in marketing.
3:01
It's really bad.
3:05
Apostrophes have been misused to make
words plural.
3:07
A lot of people misuse quotation marks to
add emphasis.
3:10
You know, for a lot of reasons but a lot
of people think to add emphasis,
3:14
they'll put something in quotation marks
because it
3:19
helps for some reason, but it actually
doesn't.
3:22
Quotation marks are used to quote someone
3:25
or something, like describing exactly what
someone said.
3:28
You know, hello, he said.
3:31
Well, he said hello, so the hello is in
quotation marks.
3:33
but, you know, for example, we provide
responsive web design.
3:37
Well, surely nothing special about
responsive in this, this case.
3:41
You know, why is it in quotes?
3:46
Is it really not responsive?
3:48
Is it some sort of imitation responsive
framework we should know about?
3:50
Now, actually, in this case, you don't use
quotation marks at all.
3:53
If you wanted to add emphasis and you're
talking about text on
3:57
a website, well, make it bold or, you
know, add the emphasis tag.
4:02
That's actually what it's there for.
4:06
And then make it stand out for a good
reason.
4:08
Subject/verb agreement.
4:09
Each sentence is generally made up of a
noun or a, and a verb.
4:12
And the two should be in agreement when
you use both.
4:17
So, here's the example here.
4:20
There's many mistakes on the page.
4:21
Well, this happens a lot in conversation,
4:23
because they're trying to say something
very quickly.
4:25
But if you write there's many mistakes on
this page, you're gonna be wrong.
4:27
There's is a contraction that means there
is.
4:32
And so if you uncontractualize that, it
would
4:35
read, there is many mistakes on the page.
4:40
And that is absolutely wrong.
4:42
There is, always refers to something
singular, whereas in
4:44
this sentence, we're talking about a
plural, many mistakes.
4:48
And so, in this sentence, we're referring
to many mistakes and so we
4:53
want to say there are many mistakes on the
page, and not there's.
4:57
So we need to try to avoid that mistake,
one of many, in the future.
5:02
Consistent tense.
5:09
All right, so, when you're writing, you
wanna try and
5:11
select a tense for your writing and keep
it consistent.
5:13
Now tense usually refers either the past,
present or the future, you know.
5:18
If you're telling a story about a favorite
project at your last job,
5:23
you would tell us in the past tense
because it happened in the past.
5:25
But whatever tense you write in, it's
important
5:29
to be consistent and not skip from past to
5:32
present to future because it can get very
5:35
confusing but also it can just be
completely wrong.
5:38
In the, our example here, I found broken
code and correct it.
5:42
Well, that's clearly wrong because I found
broken code is talking
5:46
about the past but correct it, is in the
present tense.
5:49
You need to make sure that the tense
5:53
for everything that you're talking about
is consistent.
5:55
And so we would wanna rewrite that to say
I found broken code and corrected it.
5:58
Both of those verbs are now past tense.
6:04
So that's a good sentence.
6:07
Double negatives.
6:08
This is another case where a lot of times
people
6:10
are adding something when they shouldn't
because they are emphasizing something.
6:12
They wanna add emphasis.
6:16
For example, Nick would never use no
version of Internet Explorer.
6:17
Well, that is a double negative because of
the
6:22
never and the no, you don't need that
second negative.
6:25
You simply say, Nick would never use any
version of internet explorer.
6:29
Actually you could probably even shorten
it
6:33
and say Nick would never use Internet
Explorer.
6:35
That's probably true.
6:37
But you know, keep this in mind if you
ever start a sentence with I would never,
6:39
or I don't, or something like that with a
6:43
negative, just be careful about not adding
another one.
6:46
Hope that wasn't a double negative or a
triple.
6:51
All right [LAUGH] dangling participles.
6:53
All right, it sounds funny, but it's very
serious.
6:56
This is an issue where if you're trying
6:58
to connect two sentence fragments
together, it can
7:02
sometimes sound very confusing and one,
one part
7:05
doesn't really refer to the other one
correctly.
7:09
So here's an example.
7:12
Running late again, Nick called Jason to
find out where he was.
7:13
Well, actually, you know, the, the point
of
7:18
this sentence is that Jason was running
late.
7:20
You know, Nick was on time, but he called
Jason to find out where Jason was.
7:23
So, when we say it this way, running late
again,
7:28
Nick called Jason, it kinda sounds like
Nick was running late.
7:30
But it's not true.
7:34
What we have to do sometimes is rewrite
7:35
or restructure a sentence when we have
something
7:39
like this to make sure that each fragment
7:42
agrees with and refers correctly to the
other.
7:45
So, in this case we'd wanna rewrite this
sentence for it to make the most sense.
7:48
Since Jason was running late again, Nick
called him to find out where he was.
7:53
Misplaced modifiers, you know sometimes
the placement of an adjective or
7:59
an adverb, can change the meaning of what
you're talking about.
8:03
For example, if you wanted to say that
you're mobile app had a
8:07
new logo, you wouldn't say, our new app's
logo appeared on the home screen.
8:11
Well suddenly it sounds like you're
talking about a new app, not a new logo.
8:17
The modifier here is in the wrong place.
8:21
But if you just change it slightly, just
change those two
8:24
words, our app's new logo look so much
better than before.
8:28
Now it makes sense because the app is not
new, the logo is new.
8:33
Oh, yes, misuse of the word literally.
8:37
You know, literally is an adverb, that
means
8:41
exactly, or in a literal sense, or manner.
8:44
Literally is another way that people
8:48
like to add emphasis, especially in
conversation.
8:50
But when you do it in writing, it sounds
pretty bad.
8:53
When you say something that look, when you
say something literally
8:58
happened, that means it actually happened,
exactly how you say it did.
9:01
So you know common misuse is to use it in
the figurative or the metaphorical sense.
9:07
You know, for example when I saw
9:13
that hilarious video, I literally died
laughing.
9:15
That is so incorrect, because if that was
9:18
true, I would not be giving this
presentation.
9:20
I would have deceased, or be deceased.
9:22
I would be gone.
9:25
Now, the emphasis here is a figurative
one.
9:26
The more accurate meaning is that you
laughed
9:30
a lot, or perhaps you laughed out loud, so
9:32
if you were going to rewrite this, well,
you
9:34
could actually do it a couple of different
ways.
9:36
You could take out literally completely,
and I would kinda suggest that.
9:39
You should probably avoid using it, unless
there's an appropriate need for it.
9:43
But in this case I'd probably say, when I
9:46
saw that hilarious video, I literally
laughed out loud.
9:48
Whatever actually happened, that is what
literally happened.
9:52
And the last one for this section here, I
versus me,
9:55
this is kind of a tricky one that comes up
a lot.
9:58
You know, confusion happens when you refer
to another
10:02
person and me in the second part of a
sentence.
10:04
How like, you know, give those cookies to
me and my friend.
10:07
Well in this case, I have Jason made lunch
for Nick and I.
10:13
The way to test this, is to actually
remove the
10:17
other person from the sentence and then
see how it sounds.
10:19
And you know you would be left with, Jason
made lunch for I.
10:22
And that is, of course, wrong, sounds
completely wrong.
10:26
It's just that Nick and I combination
there, or another person and I sounds
10:30
correct, but in the second part of the
sentence, you do have to refer to me.
10:35
So the correct way, to fix this would be
Jason made lunch for Nick and me.
10:41
Anytime you're not sure, which, which to
use, try that test of
10:48
removing the other person from the
sentence and you'll know for sure.
10:52
You need to sign up for Treehouse in order to download course files.
Sign upYou need to sign up for Treehouse in order to set up Workspace
Sign up